Showing posts with label screening mammogram. Show all posts
Showing posts with label screening mammogram. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

All Jokes Aside, There’s a Good Reason You’re Squeezed During a Mammogram

By Rae Miller
Many a joke has been made about the discomfort of a round breast being squeezed flat like a pancake during a mammogram, but it turns out there is sound reasoning behind it.

"The breast has to be taut," explains Carla Montgomery, a mammography technologist at The Rose. "The more pressure we use, the less 'give' there is in the breast and the more the breast tissue is spread apart.”

This, says Montgomery, means the radiologist – the physician whose specialty is “reading” mammograms – can see through the mass with no overlapping breast tissue getting in the way.

At The Rose, a Houston-area nonprofit breast cancer screening organization, women who don't care much for that temporary flattening effect can feel great about this: Every time their insurance pays for a mammogram, they have helped cover the cost of a mammogram for other women who are not insured or don’t have the ability to pay.

Women can also feel great about The Rose Galleria, says the center’s radiologist. Dr. Daniel Roubein. “There is not another medical facility in the Houston area that can claim superior technology to our new The Rose Galleria.” The newest mammography technology is digital.

Before digital mammograms, analog mammography was the standard. What is the difference between analog and digital?

Roubein explains: "Analog mammograms are similar to photographs developed from film. You can't change the color of the picture and you can't magnify it or rotate it to get a different view. With digital images like those we obtain at The Rose Galleria, we can glean more information. This means the patient may be less likely to be called back for additional imaging.”
Another advantage says Roubein, is that the information can be shared electronically if a patient’s record needs to be sent elsewhere."

Roubein reads and interprets the digital images – the mammogram – from a computer screen, but it's a team effort.

If a radiologist can't count on his mammography technologists to do the job right, he says, there's nothing to work with. Skilled technologists, says Roubein, generate diagnostic images that are meaningful and useful.

To earn these skills, Montgomery says she and other technologists must complete a two-year
X-ray college program, followed by 40 hours of mammography specialization, plus 25 mammograms.

The goal is for patients to get an experienced technologist from the get-go, she says.

Montgomery brings special knowledge to the job. At only 38, she has already had several mammograms herself, because she volunteered to be the class "guinea pig” as a student.

"I wanted to know what it was like so I could tell my patients 'this is how it's going to feel, this is how long it's going to take,’" she says.

Bedside manner cannot be taught in a classroom, but it is important. That’s why Montgomery tells women that yes, mammograms are uncomfortable, but it shouldn't take more than 10 minutes to get two images per breast.

Women tend to be nervous the first time they have a mammogram, she says. A woman’s first breast screening is called a baseline mammogram.

Baseline mammograms are important, says Roubein.

"They are the starting point for interpretation. We can interpret without a baseline if one is not available for some reason, but making comparisons between breast tissue today and breast tissue from two or three years ago is an ideal way to determine if something is benign without having to do a biopsy. "

Baseline mammograms can be a woman's first mammogram ever, or her first mammogram after surgery for breast cancer or breast implants.

So when should a woman have that first mammogram?

At age 40, or even younger if a problem pops up, Roubein says. These are not the guidelines set out in a recent study conducted by the United States Preventative Services Task Force, which recommended eliminating screening for women aged 40-49. The study said women 50-74 should be screened every other year.

Roubein says the controversial study is just not correct. "The study did not accurately portray the value of mammography. There is no arbitrary age at which breast cancer begins."

Become a fan of The Rose on Facebook.

To schedule your appointment at The Rose, call 281.484.4708 or visit www.TheRose.org.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Cost vs. Price...A message from CEO Dorothy Gibbons

By now most folks have heard about the recent controversy surrounding the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) proposed recommendations. It was listed as one of the top five news stories in the nation for 2009. These new recommendations advocate women putting off screening until age 50, instead of age 40, as current guidelines state. Needless to say, this announcement sent shockwaves throughout the breast health community for many reasons.

The suggestion that women should not begin routine screening until age 50 creates yet another barrier for women and raises so many questions around the value of mammography. The mixed messages being broadcast almost daily are taking a toll and negating years of public education about the importance of early detection in long-term survival. Access to quality breast health care should be a matter of concern for every woman, regardless of age, family medical history, or socioeconomic background.

Last year, 335 women were diagnosed with breast cancer by The Rose. Of those women, almost one-third, 105 were in their 40s and 37 were under 40 years old! Almost as many women who were diagnosed were under the “proposed recommended age of 50” as were over. Our statistics are clear and leave no doubt that mammography must continue to be affordable, accessible and available to women in their forties.

The debate is actually a question of “cost verses price.” Statistically justifying “cost” savings by eliminating screening is one thing, but there is no way—morally, ethically or statistically – to put a price on a woman’s life. That “price factor” has been ignored in the equations.

Mammography is still the most effective screening tool in finding cancer at its earliest, most treatable stage. We also believe that breast self-examination should be part of every woman’s regular health routine. Breast self-examination is by no means meant to be substitute for a physician’s medical examination or mammogram, but if you are familiar with your body, you will be the first to notice when something isn’t quite “right.”

The bottom line is your health belongs to you! Empower yourself by learning more about your personal medical history, consider the facts and talk with your personal physician. Participate in the success of your own health by committing to a mammogram as required by your personal health, family history, or age. The recommendation you settle on will be just that – personal.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Randalls Reach Stretches from Rosenberg to The Woodlands

Houston-area Randalls locations raised $225,000 to benefit The Rose’s Mobile Mammography Program. The Mobile Mammography Program serves both insured and uninsured women. The unit travels throughout Harris and surrounding counties and may be booked by corporations, organizations, churches and clinics. The goal of mobile mammography is to eliminate some of the obstacles that women face.

Our generous funders and collaborating partners made it possible for us to take mammography into neighborhoods and office buildings to help eliminate some of the barriers, like transportation and time off work.

Last year, 3,714 women were served by The Rose’s Mobile Mammography Program. Of that number, 2,744 women were uninsured and 6 were diagnosed with breast cancer. The van went to 98 sites for a total of 241 visits in Harris and 5 surrounding counties.

Women 35 and older who are not experiencing any breast symptoms or problems can be screened through the Mobile Mammography Program. Those who are under 35, have been diagnosed with breast cancer within the prior two years, are pregnant or nursing, have implants or are experiencing symptoms cannot be screened on the mobile unit and need to schedule their imaging at one of The Rose’s facilities.
Randalls has been a long-time supporter of The Rose, donating nearly $637,000 since 1997.
(Left to Right): Leslie Nelson, Randalls Vice President of Finance; Dorothy Weston Gibbons, CEO and Co-founder of The Rose; and Tom Schwilke, President of Randalls